You can’t uphold the law, or enforce the
law, or even abide by the law if you don’t know the law. While I am the first
to declare that foolish rules, like unjust laws, demand to be broken, there are
some rules that exist for a very good reason and make very good sense. For
example, the rules against assault, murder, robbery, rape and kidnapping seem
like very reasonable rules to me. The rule against parking on the left-hand
side of the street on Tuesdays, not so much.
Likewise the rules of fencing. They exist
for good reason, whether or not you have the nimbleness of wit to understand
the reason.
Neither fencers nor officials are permitted
by the rules to violate the rules. Violations stem from one or both of two
things: 1) ignorance of the rule or 2) An intent to cheat. There is no third
option.
Personally, I never ascribe to mere
ignorance that which can be adequately explained by malevolence. In my
experience ignorance is the fall-back defense of those who get caught in acts
of malevolence.
Thus let it be with Caesar.
The following excerpts from the fencing
rules, are essential for every fencer and, of course, every fencing official to
know and understand, both in what they say and in what they do NOT say, also
WHY they say what they say. (The Devil
will win the Heisman Trophy before I ever advocate mindless obedience to any rule!) Indeed, one cannot possibly fence properly and
well without knowing, understanding and complying with the rules. All added
emphases are my own.
(*Excerpts from the Fencing Rules 2011 translated from French)
t.87-1 The competitors must fence faithfully and
strictly according to the rules laid down in these Rules. All breaches of
these rules will incur the penalties laid down hereinafter (cf. t.114-t.120).
2) All
bouts must preserve the character of a courteous and frank encounter. All irregular actions (fleche attack which finishes
with a collision jostling the opponent, disorderly fencing, irregular movements
on the strip, touches achieved with violence, touches made during or after a
fall) are strictly forbidden (cf. t.114-t.120).
t.7-1 The offensive actions are the attack, the riposte and
the counter-riposte.
The attack is the initial
offensive action made by extending the arm and continuously threatening the opponent’s target, preceding the
launching of the lunge or fleche (cf. t.56ss, t.75ss).
t.10 The
point in line position is a specific
position in which the fencer’s sword arm is kept straight and the point of his
weapon continually threatens his opponent’s valid target (cf. t.56.3.a/b/c, t.60.4.e, t.60.5.a, t.76,
t.80.3.e, t.80.4.a/b).
t16-1. With all three weapons, defense must be effected
exclusively with the guard and the blade used either separately or together.
T16-2. The
weapon must not be – either permanently or temporarily, in an open or disguised
manner – transformed into a throwing weapon; it must be used without the
hand leaving the grip and without the hand slipping along the grip from front
to back during an offensive action.
T18-5 The order “Halt” is also given if the
fencing of the competitors is dangerous, confused, or contrary to the Rules, if
one of the competitors is disarmed or leaves the strip, or if, while
retreating, he approaches too near the spectators or the Referee (cf. t.26,
t.54.5 and t.73.4.j).
t.19 Fencing at close quarters is allowed so long as the competitors can wield their
weapons correctly and the Referee can, in foil and sabre, follow the
phrase.
t.34-1. By accepting a position as Referee or judge,
the person so designated pledges his honor to
respect the Rules and to cause them to be respected, and to carry out his
duties with the strictest impartiality and absolute concentration.
t.46-1. The foil is a thrusting weapon
only. Offensive actions with this
weapon are made therefore with the point and with the point only.
t.61 The Epee is a thrusting weapon only. Attacks with this weapon are
therefore made with the point and with the point only.
t.611
t.52 When using the apparatus it should be noted
that: b) the apparatus does not indicate
whether there is any priority in time between two or more touches which it
registers simultaneously.
t.55 The Referee
alone decides as to the validity or the priority of the touch by applying the
following basic rules which are the conventions applicable to foil fencing.
Respect of the fencing phrase
t56-
1. Every attack, that is every initial offensive action, which is correctly executed must be
parried or completely avoided and the phrase must be followed through –
that is to say, coordinated (cf. t.7.1).
2. In order to judge the correctness of an
attack the following points must be considered:
a) The simple attack, direct or indirect (cf. t.8.1), is
correctly executed when the extending of the arm, the point threatening the valid
target, precedes the initiation of the lunge or the fléche.
b) The compound attack (cf. t.8.1) is correctly executed
when the arm is extending in the presentation of the first feint, with the
point threatening the valid target, and the arm is not bent between the
successive actions of the attack and the initiation of the lunge or the fléche.
c) The attack with an advance-lunge or an advance-fléche
is correctly executed when the extending of the arm precedes the end of the
advance and the initiation of the lunge or
the fléche.
d) Actions, simple or compound, steps or
feints which are executed with a bent arm, are not considered as attacks but as
preparations, laying themselves open to the initiation of the offensive or
defensive/offensive action of the opponent (cf.t.8.1/3).
3. To judge the priority of
an attack when analyzing the fencing phrase, it should be noted that:
a) If the attack is initiated when the opponent is not in the point in line position (cf. t.10), it may be executed either with a direct
thrust, or by disengage, or by a cut-over, or may even be preceded by a beat or
successful feints obliging the opponent to parry.
b) If the attack is initiated when the opponent is in the point in line position (cf. t.10), the attacker must, first, deflect the
opponent’s blade. Referees must ensure that a mere grazing of the blades is not
considered as sufficient to deflect the opponent’s blade (cf. t.60.5a).
c) If the attacker, when attempting to deflect the
opponent’s blade, fails to find it (dérobement), the right of attack passes to
the opponent.
d) Continuous steps forward, with the legs crossing one
another, constitute a preparation and on this preparation any simple attack has
priority.
t.57 The parry gives the right to riposte: the
simple riposte may be direct or indirect, but to annul any subsequent action by
the attacker, it must be executed immediately, without indecision or delay.
t.58 When a compound attack is made, if the opponent finds the blade
during one of the feints, he has the right to riposte.
t.59 When compound attacks are made, the opponent has the right to
stop hit; but to be valid, the stop hit
must precede the conclusion of the attack by an interval of fencing time; that
is to say that the stop hit must arrive before the attacker has begun the final
movement of the attack.
Judging of touches
t.60 The Referee should apply
the following basic conventions of foil fencing:
1) When during a phrase, both
fencers touch at the same time, there is either a simultaneous action or a
double touch.
2) The simultaneous action is
due to simultaneous conception and execution of an attack by both fencers; in
this case the touches exchanged are annulled for both fencers even if one of
them has been touched off the target.
3) The double touch, on the other hand, is the result of a faulty action on the part of one of the
fencers. Therefore, when there is not a period of fencing time between the
touches:
4) Only the fencer who is attacked is counted as touched:
a) if he makes a
stop hit on his opponent’s simple attack;
b) if, instead of
parrying, he attempts to avoid the touch and does not succeed in so doing;
c) if, after
making a successful parry, he makes a momentary pause which gives his opponent
the right to renew the attack (redoublement, remise or reprise);
d) if, during a
compound attack, he makes a stop hit without being in time;
e) if, having his point in line (cf.t.10) and
being subjected to a beat or a taking of the blade (prise defer) which deflects
his blade, he attacks or places his point in line again instead of parrying a
direct attack made by his opponent.
5. Only the fencer who attacks is counted as touched:
a) if he initiates his attack when his opponent
has his point in line (cf.t.10) without deflecting the opponent’s weapon.
Referees must ensure that a mere grazing of the blades is not considered as
sufficient to deflect the opponent’s blade;
b) if he attempts
to find the blade, does not succeed (is the object of a dérobement) and
continues the attack;
c) if, during a
compound attack, his opponent finds the blade, but he continues the attack and
his opponent ripostes immediately;
d) if, during a
compound attack, he makes a momentary pause, during which time the opponent
makes a stop hit, after which the attacker continues his attack;
e) if, during a
compound attack, he is stop hit in time before his final movement;
f) if he makes a touch by a remise, redoublement or
reprise when his original attack has been parried and his opponent has made a
riposte which is immediate, simple, and executed in one period of fencing time without withdrawing the arm.
6. The Referee must replace
the competitors on guard each time that there is a double touch and he is
unable to judge clearly on which side the fault lies.
t.75 (sabre)
3. An attack with a lunge is
correctly carried out:
a) in a simple attack (cf.t.8.1) when the beginning of the extending of the arm precedes the launching
of the lunge and the touch arrives at the latest when the front foot touches
the strip;
t.79 (sabre) b) When
a parry is properly executed, the attack by the opponent must be declared
parried and judged as such by the Referee, even
if, as a result of its flexibility, the tip of the opponent’s weapon makes
contact with the target.
t.82 Fencers
must observe strictly and faithfully the Rules and
the Statutes of the FIE, the particular rules for the competition in which they
are engaged, the traditional customs of courtesy and integrity and
the instructions of the officials.
2. In particular they will subscribe, in an orderly,
disciplined and sporting manner, to the
following provisions; all breaches of these rules may entail punishments by the
competent disciplinary authorities after, or even without, prior warning,
according to the facts and circumstances (cf. t.113-t.120).
t.821
Fencing etiquette
t87-3) Before
the beginning of each bout, the two fencers must perform a fencer’s salute to
their opponent, to the Referee and to the spectators. Equally, when the final
touch has been scored, the bout has not ended until the two fencers have
saluted each other, the Referee and the spectators; to this end, they must
remain still while the Referee is making his decision; when he has given his
decision, they must return to their on guard line, perform a fencer’s salute
and shake hands with their opponent. If either or both of the two fencers
refuse to comply with these rules, the Referee will penalize him/them as
specific for offenses of the 4 group (cf. t.114, t.119, t.120).
Protests
and appeals
Against a decision of the
Referee
t.122
1. No appeal can be made against the decision of
the Referee regarding a point of fact (cf. t.95.1/2/4, t.96.2).
2. If a fencer infringes this principle, casting
doubt on the decision of the Referee on a point of fact during the bout, he
will be penalized according to the Rules (cf. t.114, t.116, t.120). But if
the Referee is ignorant of or misunderstands a definite rule, or applies it in
a manner contrary to the Rules, an appeal on this matter may be entertained.
3. This appeal must be made:
a) in
individual events, by the fencer;
b) in
team events, by the fencer or the team captain.
This appeal should be made courteously but
without formality, and should be made verbally to the referee immediately
and before and decision is made regarding a subsequent action
4. If the Referee maintains his opinion, the Head
Referee has authority to settle an appeal (cf. t.97). If such an appeal is
deemed to be unjustified, the fencer will be penalized in accordance with
Articles t.114, t.116, t.120).
Prior to around 1980, these rules were
universally accepted. Those who fenced in any other manner were simply consider
very poor fencers. But there was much
wailing and gnashing of teeth that fencing was not as popular (read that
“profitable”), not a “spectator sport” as, say, football. Apparently, no one
pointed out that the best fencing is sly
and subtle, and such nuances are difficult to observe and appreciate from 50
yards away, while drinking beer, eating a hot dog or performing a wave.
So the gauntlet was cast: how can we make
fencing more like football?
Along came lights and whistles, and
colored uniforms, and video re-play, and big, wild, loud “fencing.” Farewell, Bach, hello Death metal.
However, as more an more people were
recruited into fencing (in the vain hope of finding a champion in the rough who
would produce a gold medal for the good old USA), more and more very poor
fencers were produced, accumulating at the bottom of the pyramid. Not only unskillful, but with no particular
affective loyalty to the long-established “code” of gentlemanly (or ladylike)
conduct.
But, as they say in football, “Winning
isn’t everything; it’s the ONLY thing.” HOW you win isn’t part of the equation.
If you can cheat and get away with it, well, then it isn’t really cheating. And
especially not if everyone else does it, too.
In time, those very poor fencers became
very poor officials, who redefined fencing by a deadly combination of
incompetence, negligence and arrogance.
The inevitable result was the savage
dumbing-down of fencing, until it bore utterly no resemblance to either a frank
encounter or a courteous one.
And that is where we are
today.
Sometimes, when you
change a thing enough from it's original conception and form, it ceases
to be the thing. The above photo is a picture of my new guitar. I've
customized it a little.
-- aac